The evidence behind the BioBloom test menu

The science behind every area on our menu. Where the evidence is strong we say so; where it is still developing we say that too.

4 articles ~23 minAll

Research by area

The evidence, area by area

Evidence curated by the BioBloom clinical team. Citations via PubMed; DOI links provided.

Well-established

Female factor

Karyotyping and FMR1 (fragile-X) premutation testing are guideline-recommended parts of the premature-ovarian-insufficiency and reduced-ovarian-reserve workup.

Limitations: These tests identify risk factors, not certainties. The FMR1 premutation is incompletely penetrant: it raises the risk of ovarian insufficiency but does not predict whether or when it will occur.

Well-established; prenatal exome maturing

Prenatal

cfDNA/NIPT is a highly accurate screening test for the common trisomies. Microarray and QF-PCR are first-line diagnostics on invasive samples, with prenatal exome adding yield in selected cases.

Limitations: cfDNA/NIPT is a screening test, not a diagnosis: a high-risk result requires confirmatory invasive testing, and performance for microdeletions is more limited than for the common trisomies.

AZF/CFTR established; DNA fragmentation developing

Male factor

Y-chromosome (AZF) microdeletion testing and CFTR analysis in CBAVD are well-established diagnostics. Sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm FISH are useful adjuncts, best interpreted alongside the wider workup.

Limitations: AZF and CFTR testing are diagnostic; sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm FISH are adjuncts with no single agreed cut-off. Thresholds are assay-specific, professional bodies differ on when to use them, and a result does not by itself determine treatment.

Carrier screening established; adjuncts developing

Carrier & reproductive risk

Expanded carrier screening is the ACMG-endorsed standard for identifying reproductive risk. Embryo polygenic scoring and immunogenetic adjuncts are active areas of research, best used within a specialist context.

Limitations: KIR-HLA-C is described by researchers in the field as too early for clinical intervention (Moffett 2016), and the ALIFE2 randomised trial found heparin did not improve live birth in inherited thrombophilia with recurrent loss. Embryo polygenic risk scoring has no established clinical utility and is not a routine test.

PGT-M/SR established; PGT-A used selectively

PGT & embryo testing

PGT-M and PGT-SR are well-established for monogenic disease and structural rearrangements. PGT-A and non-invasive PGT-A are best used selectively, with the clearest signal in older patients per transfer.

Limitations: Randomised trials have not shown PGT-A to improve cumulative live birth in unselected patients: it selects between existing embryos rather than improving them. niPGT-A from spent culture medium is investigational, and its concordance with trophectoderm biopsy varies between laboratories.

Growing evidence baseFlagship series above ↑

Endometrial microbiome & receptivity

A Lactobacillus-dominant endometrium and the absence of chronic endometritis are increasingly linked to better implantation, with randomised outcome data still maturing.

Limitations: Most evidence comes from small, low-biomass sequencing cohorts, and randomised evidence that treating dysbiosis improves live birth is not yet available. A dysbiotic result describes a bacterial pattern; it is not a diagnosis of infection.

A note on reading this literature

Low-biomass environments are unforgiving

The endometrium carries a fraction of the bacterial load found in the vagina or gut. At those biomass levels, contamination from reagents, swabs, the cervix, or the lab itself can swamp the real signal. Studies that don’t account for this can produce misleading taxonomies.

When comparing studies, the questions worth asking are: was sampling transcervical or at hysterectomy, was a double-lumen catheter used, were negative controls sequenced, and was contamination partitioning applied?

BioBloom holds its own methodology to the same standards we apply when reading the literature.

A decade of research

18 papers · 2015-2025

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

The library

The papers we read, ordered by what they teach us

A curated set, not an index. Each entry links to the primary source and expands for study design, sample and limitations.

Curated · Last reviewed April 2026

Showing 1-4 of 18 papers

Ready to investigate your endometrial microbiome?

Testing is ordered through partner fertility clinics. Ask your fertility specialist whether the assay suits your workup.

Accreditations & governance

  • ICO logo

    ICO registered

  • MHRA logo

    MHRA registered

  • ISO logo

    ISO 15189 accredited laboratory.

  • Cyber Essentials